Morel’s Invention is a classic Argentine Science Fiction novel from the 1940s. Written in spare, elegant Spanish, it is accessible to the intermediate student of the language. Adolfo Bioy Casares is a well known figure in the Hispanic world, but not widely read in English. An author of novels and short stories, his prose is in many ways more readable than that of his famous contemporary Jorge Luis Borges (whose poetry is seen as his main legacy in Latin America). The two were close friends, writing and publishing literary detective stories together under a pseudonym. Bioy Casares wrote the definitive Spanish language biography of Borges, a tome of over 1000 pages, while the blind master penned as a prologue to his colleagues’s best known work: “It does not strike me as imprecision or hyperbole to classify it as perfect” (11). Often remembered for its anticipation of holograms and hypereality, Morel’s Invention is also one of the twentieth centuries strangest and most haunting love stories.
A nameless Venezuelan fugitive arrives on a deserted and inhospitable island, where he finds a swimming pool, a chapel and a museum with a basement full of mysterious machinery. Soon afterwards a group of strangers arrives on the island and he is forced to hide in the swamps “between the aquatic plants, and the indignity of mosquitoes, with filthy water to the waist” (13). Everywhere we are given hints that our narrator’s perceptions are not be trusted. “You would think from their inexplicable appearance that they were effects of last night’s heat on my brain” (16). And yet he insists “ these are no hallucinations or images, these are real men, at least as real as I.” He watches from a distance as they proceed to sunbathe, listening to the phonograph and bathe in the pool full of frogs and vipers, as though on summer holiday. Have they come to capture him and bring him to justice, or for some other, stranger purpose?
The narrator becomes captivated by the beautiful Faustine, a gypsy woman who watches the sunset from the cliffs every evening. He is aware that his feelings may be little more than “the affection of accumulated solitude” (39), but tries to woo her anyway, leaving a message written in wildflowers, “The timid homage of an admirer” (53). When his advances are ignored, he begins to suspect that the strangers can neither see nor hear him. Their appearances coincide with the periodic flooding of his swamp refuge at high tide. Could there possibly be some connection to the machines in the basement? They appear to be repeating the same gestures and conversations endlessly.
It won’t spoil the novel too much to reveal that our protagonist has, in fact, fallen in love with a hologram. His rival Morel, the inventor of the device, has produced three dimensional images of his friends through “a new kind of photography” (106). The concept is charged with philosophical possibility. Do the reproductions have souls? Is it possible to feel love for a being without a soul? Many cultures, the narrator reminds us, fear that when a photograph is taken, the soul may pass to the image and the person die. And what of ethics? As is so often the case in Science Fiction, technology is a source of potential corruption. In pursuing his “sentimental fantasy” of an eternally recurring beach holiday (108), Morel may have exposed his friends to dangerous radiation.
Bioy Casares’s extremely knowing text is itself, of course, a kind of literary hologram, a replica of any number of previous desert island narratives, Robinson Crusoe, The Swiss Family Robinson, Coral Island, Treasure Island and Moreau’s Island to name just a few. But while the island was traditionally a site of conflict between humans and nature, here the struggle is between humans and machines. In the nuclear age there is no corner of the earth beyond the threatening reach of technology, no human relationship that is not mediated by it to some degree. The true prescience of Morel’s Invention, then, lies not in its anticipation of specific scientific innovations, but in its awareness of technology’s consequences for the human soul. Family dinners before the television screen, bus loads of commuters with headphones, huddled millions seeking sex through their computer monitors; these are all symptoms of the modern ache. It is technology’s potential to isolate as well as connect that the novel anticipates. The most enduringly remote island, it suggests, is the estranged individual, who may never be able to cross the unbridgeable gulf between self and other. “To be in love with an image is worse than to be in love with a ghost,” concludes our protagonist, before adding ambiguously, “perhaps we have always wanted the one we love to have the existence of a ghost” (121). His final desperate strategy to capture his beloved, like the conclusion to all great stories, is both unforeseen and inevitable, recalling a Borges verse from The Self and the Other:
“In the clear glass of a dream, I have glimpsed
The Heaven and Hell that lies in wait for us…
A sleeping face, faithful, still, unchangeable
(the face of the one you love, or, perhaps, your own)
And the sheer contemplation of that face…
Will be for the rejected, an Inferno,
And for the elected, Paradise.” (151)
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Confessions of an Economic Hitman
John Perkin’s 2004 autobiography was written in the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. The book details the author’s participation in some of America’s more dubious foreign policy adventures of the 1960s and 1970s, during his decade as a self described “economic hitman.” Written as a kind of state of the nation address, Confessions deliberately sets up its author as a representative figure, a corrupted New Hampshire innocent who must declare his guilt in order to be redeemed. It speaks to a collective North American “us,” still reeling from the terrorist attacks, and suggests implicitly that if one man can change from agent of empire to critic of imperialism, America may yet reconnect with its founding values.
Although Perkins is much less rhetorically gifted than Barrack Obama, it’s easy to imagine those who made his book a New York Times bestseller also buying the “yes we can” message. Indeed, both Obama and Perkins sometimes evoke the older tradition of the puritan jeremiad, the critique delivered to strengthen resolve in a time of hardship.
This mode of address can sound messianic to those of us outside the US, especially in Australia with our preference for side of the mouth understatement. In his acceptance speech, Obama at least made a point of reaching out to “those beyond our shores.” Perkins displays no such capacity for nuance: “Let this book, then, be the start of our salvation” (iv), he writes his the introduction. His story, thankfully, is interesting enough that we are inclined to overlook such hyperbole.
From 1971 to 1981 Perkins worked as an economist for US consultancy firm Chas. T Main. He was sent to developing countries “to encourage world leaders to become part of a vast network that promotes US commercial interests” (xi). In practice, this meant encouraging the political classes of countries like Ecuador, Indonesia, Panama and Saudi Arabia to take out massive loans that they often struggled to pay back. These were necessary to fund ambitious infrastructure projects, usually built by US construction firms. The book combines travel memoir and a broad brush overview of American foreign policy during the Cold War, but it is Perkin’s ethical struggle that drives the narrative forward.
How does one become an economic hit man? “It began innocently enough” (3). Perkins, it seems, was not recruited on the basis of any particular aptitude for the dismal science, but because he’d worked for the Peacecorp in the Amazon and personality tests showed he was of weak character, pliable and eager to please. Claudine Martin, an attractive senior colleague, who it is coyly implied slept with him during training, gives him some rudimentary preparation and tells him that he is “in for life” (12).
Soon this American Adam finds himself deliberately distorting economic growth figures in Indonesia (54), providing a Saudi Prince with a live in American mistress (93-94), and accepting a substantial bribe not to publish an earlier version of his memoirs (171). His account of MAIN’s organizational structure is significant. “As an EHM I never drew a penny directly from the NSA or any other government agency; MAIN paid my salary. I was a private citizen, employed by a private corporation” (180). Here we see the outsourcing of dirty work that would later characterize the Bush administration’s approach to the War on Terror.
Perkins’s most serious accusations against the US are that it masterminded the suspicious deaths of Ecuadorian president Jaime Roldos and Panamanian President Omar Torrijos in the 1980s. These crimes are not attributed to MAIN, but to forces within the shadowy alliance of US political, business and intelligence interests referred to in the book as the “corporatocracy” (an updated version of Eisenhower’s military industrial complex). The “New Hampshire Prep School on the hill” where Perkins studied, becomes a motif for lost innocence, hinting that the light on the hill that traditionally stood for American promise has dimmed.
While Perkins has great material, he is not a writer. Describing a chance encounter with Graham Greene in a Panama coffee shop, he refers to the British novelist’s famous work “The Pride and the Glory,” (sic) an error which suggests he probably hasn’t read it. He goes to some length to assure us of the veracity of his tale. “This is not a fiction this is the true story of my life” (x). But we automatically mistrust people who are too insistent they are telling a true story, especially when their writing fails to convince. He plants long implausible passages of expository dialogue in characters’ mouths: “The Shah of Saudi Arabia is your only really ally in the Middle East, and the industrial world rotates on the axle of oil that is the Middle East” (114). He will not allow for the inherent messiness of living, identifying too many neat narrative turning points, and often exaggerating their significance, “It was a night I will never forget, and one that has influenced the rest of my life” (43). He make clumsy use of leitmotifs, “staring into the water of that putrid canal, I once again saw images of the New Hampshire prep school on the hill” (32). The facts may be objectively true, but they do not feel true. Good writing can give the most fanciful nonsense verisimilitude; here the opposite occurs, compelling real life events are made to seem stagy and vaguely manipulative.
The final quarter of the book deals with Perkin’s post-MAIN career as CEO of an alternative energy company, and with his long struggle to write and publish his tell all account. Like a cross between a self-help guru and a vacuum cleaner salesman, Perkins assumes that those who forked out $25 for his memoirs will be irrevocably changed by the experience, “you are ready to leave the book behind and pounce on the world” (225). While few of us are likely to be swayed to this extent, Perkin’s story is an important one and does have something tell us about the nature of the world’s first global empire, even if the lessons we learn are not necessarily those the author intended. Confessions of an Economic Hitman’s amalgam of idealism and virulent self-promotion, is as deeply American as Dreams from My Father, and just as deeply of our historical moment.
Although Perkins is much less rhetorically gifted than Barrack Obama, it’s easy to imagine those who made his book a New York Times bestseller also buying the “yes we can” message. Indeed, both Obama and Perkins sometimes evoke the older tradition of the puritan jeremiad, the critique delivered to strengthen resolve in a time of hardship.
This mode of address can sound messianic to those of us outside the US, especially in Australia with our preference for side of the mouth understatement. In his acceptance speech, Obama at least made a point of reaching out to “those beyond our shores.” Perkins displays no such capacity for nuance: “Let this book, then, be the start of our salvation” (iv), he writes his the introduction. His story, thankfully, is interesting enough that we are inclined to overlook such hyperbole.
From 1971 to 1981 Perkins worked as an economist for US consultancy firm Chas. T Main. He was sent to developing countries “to encourage world leaders to become part of a vast network that promotes US commercial interests” (xi). In practice, this meant encouraging the political classes of countries like Ecuador, Indonesia, Panama and Saudi Arabia to take out massive loans that they often struggled to pay back. These were necessary to fund ambitious infrastructure projects, usually built by US construction firms. The book combines travel memoir and a broad brush overview of American foreign policy during the Cold War, but it is Perkin’s ethical struggle that drives the narrative forward.
How does one become an economic hit man? “It began innocently enough” (3). Perkins, it seems, was not recruited on the basis of any particular aptitude for the dismal science, but because he’d worked for the Peacecorp in the Amazon and personality tests showed he was of weak character, pliable and eager to please. Claudine Martin, an attractive senior colleague, who it is coyly implied slept with him during training, gives him some rudimentary preparation and tells him that he is “in for life” (12).
Soon this American Adam finds himself deliberately distorting economic growth figures in Indonesia (54), providing a Saudi Prince with a live in American mistress (93-94), and accepting a substantial bribe not to publish an earlier version of his memoirs (171). His account of MAIN’s organizational structure is significant. “As an EHM I never drew a penny directly from the NSA or any other government agency; MAIN paid my salary. I was a private citizen, employed by a private corporation” (180). Here we see the outsourcing of dirty work that would later characterize the Bush administration’s approach to the War on Terror.
Perkins’s most serious accusations against the US are that it masterminded the suspicious deaths of Ecuadorian president Jaime Roldos and Panamanian President Omar Torrijos in the 1980s. These crimes are not attributed to MAIN, but to forces within the shadowy alliance of US political, business and intelligence interests referred to in the book as the “corporatocracy” (an updated version of Eisenhower’s military industrial complex). The “New Hampshire Prep School on the hill” where Perkins studied, becomes a motif for lost innocence, hinting that the light on the hill that traditionally stood for American promise has dimmed.
While Perkins has great material, he is not a writer. Describing a chance encounter with Graham Greene in a Panama coffee shop, he refers to the British novelist’s famous work “The Pride and the Glory,” (sic) an error which suggests he probably hasn’t read it. He goes to some length to assure us of the veracity of his tale. “This is not a fiction this is the true story of my life” (x). But we automatically mistrust people who are too insistent they are telling a true story, especially when their writing fails to convince. He plants long implausible passages of expository dialogue in characters’ mouths: “The Shah of Saudi Arabia is your only really ally in the Middle East, and the industrial world rotates on the axle of oil that is the Middle East” (114). He will not allow for the inherent messiness of living, identifying too many neat narrative turning points, and often exaggerating their significance, “It was a night I will never forget, and one that has influenced the rest of my life” (43). He make clumsy use of leitmotifs, “staring into the water of that putrid canal, I once again saw images of the New Hampshire prep school on the hill” (32). The facts may be objectively true, but they do not feel true. Good writing can give the most fanciful nonsense verisimilitude; here the opposite occurs, compelling real life events are made to seem stagy and vaguely manipulative.
The final quarter of the book deals with Perkin’s post-MAIN career as CEO of an alternative energy company, and with his long struggle to write and publish his tell all account. Like a cross between a self-help guru and a vacuum cleaner salesman, Perkins assumes that those who forked out $25 for his memoirs will be irrevocably changed by the experience, “you are ready to leave the book behind and pounce on the world” (225). While few of us are likely to be swayed to this extent, Perkin’s story is an important one and does have something tell us about the nature of the world’s first global empire, even if the lessons we learn are not necessarily those the author intended. Confessions of an Economic Hitman’s amalgam of idealism and virulent self-promotion, is as deeply American as Dreams from My Father, and just as deeply of our historical moment.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
